What You Need to Know about Your Birth Control

Content

The What You Need to Know about Your Birth Control Campaign Initiative contains four projects which are designed to critically examine contemporary reproductive practices and challenge discriminatory population control ideologies. They are:

1) What You Need to Know about Your Birth Control Booklet: In opposition to profit driven contraceptive advertising, the booklet critically examines popular modern contraceptive methods, adequately weighing the health risks and benefits.

2) Self Assessment Surveys: The self assessment survey is designed to collect quantitative and qualitative data regarding the contraceptive method(s) individuals are choosing to use. This will be a tool used to accurately measure which communities are being targeted for specific types of contraceptives and to document experiences and knowledge base of different contraceptive methods.

3) Depo Diaries National Storytelling Project: This project uses personal narratives to explore the physical and emotional experiences of women while using the hormonal contraceptive Depo Provera.

4) Voices against Coercive Reproductive Practices: Using public education and media to document coercive reproductive practices including: sterilization abuse, high risk contraceptivese, and population control policies, from the experiences of women globally.

The What You Need to Know about Your Birth Control Campaign Initiative has its own specific mission, vision, values and goals:

Mission:
To promote health and justice in our communities

Vision:
A world that embraces our human right to have safe and voluntary sex, birth control, abortion, and motherhood as we define it.

Values:
Building Collective Leadership
Honoring Our Voices
Standing Up for Our Lives
Multimedia (Public) Education
Accountability

Goals:
Capture our experiences of coercive reproductive practices
Understand the effects of contraceptives on our bodies and lives
Build leadership and knokwledge
Promote systemic change

Please contact us for organizing and designing critical dialogues, trainings and actions against coercive reproductive tactics.

Send an email to powerofstories@cwpe.org to learn more about using storytelling as a tool for liberatory practices against violence and population control .

If interested in telling your story of how depo provera may have impacted your body or life, please go to http://www.cwpe.org/initiatives/depodiaries Or write your testimony to: depodiaries@cwpe.org

Side Content

National Director Speaks Out at SisterSong!

Controlling Our Communities through Our Bodies

Poetic Speech given at SisterSong Conference Spring 2007
By Cara Page

National Director of the Committee on Women Population and the Environment; she is a queer of color artist, organizer, and healing arts practitioner. A recipient of the Rockefeller Foundation Next Generation Leadership Fellowship (2000 – 2001) and awarded for her leadership and contributions as an artist and activist for human rights by the National Center for Human Rights & Education. She is founder of Deeper Waters, a company providing reflective and creative practice as tools for organizing and individual and collective transformation. (cara@cwpe.org or deeperwaters@gmail.com)

Blessings Everyone!

I want to give thanks for the land we are standing on and the ancestral burial ground we are most likely standing above. I want to give testimony to those who have lost their bodies and lives in our communities through being commodified, criminalized, sexualized, colonized, and stigmatized.

I dedicate this piece to all of their lives and the lives of the maquiladora workers dying at the borders of Ciudad Juarez, Mexico for profit and drug money wars.

I want to give thanks for our bodies that we are healing, recovering, regenerating and transforming in this work that we do for reproductive justice.

What is our communities relationship to being controlled through our bodies for sex?

For having sex we are criminalized based on who we do it with and how we do it.

For being sexual we are eroticized and objectified.

For some of us getting paid for sex, we are still inappropriately blamed and shamed as committing a crime.

For some of us our bodies are used like artillery, through colonization and war crimes.

And still we are the ones being pathologized…

For even being sexual and having children in our queer bodies, women of color, disabled bodies, trans bodies, immigrant and refugee bodies. Our fertility is targeted as being shameful and unnecessary and we are only seen as breeders instead of parents and families.

For all of us; it is the sum of money, and war, capitalism, slave labor and corruption that we have become commodities of.

By existing in our bodies and loving our erotic selves we are redefining our justice and our power over the sovereignty and the autonomy of our bodies.

We need to be on a need to know basis with our bodies and lives:

Not to rely on state mandates and the medical industrial complex or government to tell us what is wellness and health.

Not to let pass immigrant and refugee law that take over borders and our sovereignty.

We need to be on a NEED to KNOW BASIS ABOUT OUR BODIES & LIVES.

The Committee on Women Population and the Environment (CWPE) is mapping our stories to tell the truth of our bodies, and sexual lives being targeted and controlled. In the ‘What You Need to Know about your Birth Control Campaign’ we are seeking to expose and stop coercive reproductive practices, dangerous contraceptives and contemporary uses of sterilization abuse. Please come to us and tell us your stories of being controlled by cumulative adverse effects of birth control.

Help us get out the word about the rampant and disproportionate use of depo provera on young women, poor women, women with disabilities, women of color, and trans people.

Support us in tracking and stopping the distribution of sterilization pills like Progesterex and Quinacrine on immigrant and refugee women.

Help us oppose the state mandates of Gardasil by Merck and campaign paid state legislators.

Join us in critiquing and changing the re-emergence of new hormonal and invasive birth control procedures that still put our lives at risk.

Help us fight for the justice of our bodies and lives. This is not justice when we are, for generations after generations, still exposed to adverse effects and high risk unethical testing. It will only be justice when we are able to hold our bodies, embrace our bodies, love our bodies, own our bodies and be in our bodies present and whole…

Here at this SisterSong conference we are not just talking about sex, sexuality, gender based violence; we are talking about being pushed into using hormonal contraceptives whether your lesbian, gay, gender queer or straight, being involuntarily forced to use birth control that has our hair falling out, stops our sex drive, gives us depression, and paranoia. We are not only talking about sex as a taboo we are fighting for knowing our bodies and knowing our own geographies.

We need to find the compass to map our own territories and borders of our sex, sexuality, gender, and our erotic.

In talking about sex today we are risking our lives here, by redefining our relationship to our bodies and spirits, perhaps even to love, and (in the words of Audre Lorde, a fierce Caribbean Lesbian Poet) defining our erotic as power. When we are able to be sexual voluntarily and consensually we are able to have the freedom of choosing to receive touch and to give it, to receive energy and life and to give it, to possibly even receive love and transform it.

I want to push past the boundaries of sex, and think about transforming our own vision of our erotic selves inside of this reproductive justice movement; our erotic being defined as political, and spiritual. How can we push back against preconceived notions of our bodies as land to be conquered, or borders to be climbed and mounted? Making these our own geographies where we have the power and the choice to resist the notions of state, communal, and intimate violence on our bodies, and to re-imagine ourselves.

How do we take back images and mythologies of who we are?

We are controlled by being told how to love, who to love, who to parent, and who not to parent.

We are told and controlled what to put inside ourselves by state mandates and privatization of food, water, medical care, and technologies.

We are told not to bleed, not to survive, not to live.

We are shamed to not to be sexual in our own right, not to be powerful in our own right, not to be righteous, sexy and self loving in our vision of ourselves.

We are fed views of only being enslaved bodies, or disenfranchised bodies and displaced bodies. Often seeing ourselves as disembodied from our hearts, minds and intellect, voices, bodies, and spirits

We are blamed for being the root cause of environmental degradation and burdening all natural resources; instead of the top 1% of the wealthier population being accused for the amount of resources they waste or the devastation of war, or toxic waste of weapons.

We are falsely accused of ‘over population’ and being ‘unfit breeders’ based on capitalist, racist assumption with imagery often scape goating women of color and poor people as the reason for: abject poverty, and natural disasters like Katrina and the tsunami.

We are targeted for racist fertility control programs instead of the government being defied for wasting our natural resources; bottling up and selling our water back to us, and re-developing our lands to sell it back to us on toxic waste dumps.

Under the guise of national security we are shamed for having children of color. Blamed by the ‘youth bulge’ mythology that purports terrorism is on the rise because of single mother households, and young males being raised on their own in Africa and the Middle East. Instead of looking at terrorist acts of imperialism, and domestic international militarization on communities of color and developing nations; or the systems of trauma and violence manifested in the prison industrial complex, or the impact of Christian fundamentalism, war, and generational eugenics.

We are vilified for addiction through programs such as Project Prevention (other wise known as Children Requiring a Caring Kommunity CRACK) that uses a national media campaign to compare women of color substance users to puppies ‘breeding addicted babies like litters’. They are giving us $300 incentives in exchange for tubal ligations; instead of seeking recovery and support for the livelihood of our communities.

We are stigmatized by not being able to raise babies in queer and transgender households based on myths and stereotypes of sexual perversion and binary gender norms.

We are punished by welfare reform through family caps and medicaid administering high risk birth control causing cumulative adverse effects to poor women, incarcerated women, women with disabilities and women of color’s bodies.

We continue to be controlled by US and international law and policies that mask state control through false pretenses of ‘gender sensitive’ policies to create NEW women’s prisons (Don’t we have enough already?) that insinuate incarcerated women should have the ‘choice’ to be sterilized----- when it was never a choice to begin with.

And we are commodified as new testing grounds for surrogacy, egg donation and scientific research of genetic contraceptive technologies that are market driven and not tested for our safety and well being.

Yet, amidst all of this craziness we have a compass to navigate; and we have and must find places and spaces of healing, recovery and transformation that look like ourselves.


Our erotic is our power…and our sex and sexuality should be in our control.

Our erotic is our power…and our love should be in our control.

Our erotic is our power…and our erotic should be in our control.

Thank You.



Please do not print or distribute without permission.

CWPE and YWEP Statement on Gardasil

Gender Justice Statement Update

Dear Allies,

Thank you for signing on to Justice Now & Committee on Women, Population, and the Environment's Gender Justice Statement Opposing Prison Expansion and Eugenics! This alert gives you an update on the Gender Justice campaign and has several follow up requests.

The good news is this: because of your support, along with over 2,700 people in California's women's prisons and other organizations and individuals across California opposed to AB 76, we've forced the bill author to request more time for the policy committee hearing! AB 76 was originally scheduled for committee hearing this TUES 2/27, so we have ten days until the rescheduled hearing on TUES 3/13 to continue to mobilize and grow opposition to expansion of the women's prisons. Thanks to everyone's hard work, the committee chair is still undecided on how to vote and has not issued a recommendation to committee. This means what we do the week of 3/5 is crucial!

What we need from you now is, in order of importance:

  1. ASAP BY WED 3/7: If you haven't already done so, copy and paste the below text of the GJ Statement (you can delete the organizational and individual endorsements except your own) onto your organization's letterhead. Print, sign, and fax the letter to California Assembly Public Safety Committee at (916) 319-3745 and CC Justice Now at (510) 839-7615 (for our records). Apologies for this paper chase; the committee has informed us that they do need letterhead and signatures to verify authenticity.
  2. ASAP BY THURS 3/8: If you haven't already done so, call California Assembly Public Safety Committee at (916) 319-3744 to confirm that they've received your AB 76 oppose letter and that your organization will appear under registered opposition in the bill analysis for the hearing 3/13. Once you confirm, shoot me an email to let us know -- thanks!
  3. FOR TUES 3/13: Do you have staff, members, or volunteers who can come to testify in Sacramento as a "me too" in opposition to AB 76? Your oppose letters are crucial, and showing up in committee carries that much more weight. If someone from your organization can come, please get in touch with me ASAP. We're holding an info session tentatively WED 3/7 at Justice Now for folks who haven't testified before, about the process, etc. We can also arrange carpools for the day of the hearing.
  4. FOR FRI 3/9 and MON 3/12: Do you have staff, members, volunteers, family, friends, who can make calls? If so, have them call Erika Contreras, public safety staffer for Jose Solorio, chair of California's Assembly Public Safety Committee to alert her that your organization has formally submitted an oppose letter to AB 76. Urge Solorio to vote NO on AB 76 and recommend the same to the committee. Solorio's office number is (916) 319-2069 -- ask for Erika. The message is simple (and feel free to adapt based on your work, and why you signed on): "AB 76 is a fraud reform! Rather than helping people in women's prisons, this bill would expand the prison system by adding a new system of mini prisons threatening to harm thousands more women and children. Lead California in the right direction by stopping policy that would track more people into prison and developed by a commission also proposing to offer sterilization to people during labor and delivery as "medically necessary"!"
  5. Scroll all the way down for the current list of organizations and individuals who have asked us to submit the GJ Statement on their behalf in opposition to AB 76. Are there folks we should reach out to for the statement? Please forward the GJ Statement (attached as PDF) or let us know who we should be in touch with!

Thanks so much for all your work!

Assembly Member Jose Solorio, Chair
Attention: Nicole Hanson
Assembly Public Safety Committee
LOB Room 111
Sacramento, CA 95814
via facsimile (916) 319-3745

RE: AB 76 OPPOSE

To the Honorable Assembly Member Solorio,

We, the undersigned individuals and organizations committed to justice for women and girls from across the United States, call on legislators, community members, activists and academics to join us in stopping prison expansion and the reinstitutionalization of state-sponsored eugenicist practices defining who is “fit” and “unfit” to reproduce in the United States. Accountability to communities of color and low-income communities demands your opposition to these practices and your commitment to true gender justice.

There is a dangerous new movement in the United States that threatens to radically expand the reach of imprisonment and its harms on women, girls, transgender and gender non-conforming people, and their communities. Using a theory of “gender responsiveness” purportedly aimed at improving women’s lives, this movement seeks to exploit the grave needs of people in women’s prisons and their families in order to foster public support for prison expansion. This “gender responsiveness” movement has launched itself in California with the creation of a “Gender Responsive Strategies Commission” of the state’s corrections department. The commission is pushing to expand the women’s prison system by adding a new system of mini prisons dressed as “community-based” and “alternatives to incarceration”, increasing the number of women’s prison beds in California by up to 40% in two years. Proponents of prison expansion now are exporting this “gender responsive” model across the country.

Over the last few decades, the number of people in women’s prisons has grown by almost 500%, reflecting an increase in imprisonment for “crimes of survival” resulting from poverty. Mass imprisonment has had a devastating impact on women, girls, transgender and gender non-conforming people, and families from communities of color and low-income communities, where people are disproportionately targeted for surveillance and imprisonment. State violence through medical neglect, brutality, and sexual abuse occurs regularly in prison, and the harms of imprisonment have long-term reach by ripping apart entire families and communities.

Today, the stakes of United States’ reliance on imprisonment have been raised. With its “gender responsive” prison expansion plan, California's Gender Responsive Strategies Commission has proposed to affirmatively offer sterilization during labor and delivery as a “necessary” medical procedure.

This exact tactic of affirmatively offering the “choice” of sterilization during the pain and stress of labor was often systematically performed as an involuntary procedure by the United States government for decades. This includes the forced sterilization of over a quarter of indigenous women in the United States in the 1970s and the state campaign resulting in over a third of all Puerto Rican women of childbearing age losing their reproductive capacity between 1930 and 1970. These are but two examples of the eugenicist programs developed by the United States to control the population growth of communities it deemed unworthy—usually people of color, LGBTIQ people, and people with disabilities—the same programs which informed the eugenicist programs of Nazi Germany. These shameful historical and contemporary practices are ones we cannot afford to forget. Further, it is particularly tragic that such policy would be recommended so soon after California formally apologized for its eugenicist programs impacting 20,000 people in state hospitals in the early part of the 20th century.

It is shocking that sterilization in a coercive environment like prison would even be suggested. Sterilization is a permanent procedure with a eugenicist history; it is precisely because of this history that the federal government and the American College of Obstetricians and Gynecologists have adopted regulations prohibiting postpartum sterilizations at times of stress, undo pressure, duress, or undue influence. Sterilizing women in state confinement without access to outside sources of healthcare or information runs afoul to these regulations.

What's worse is that it was recommended by a commission purportedly created to improve women’s lives. When the state denies people in prison access to other elective, “non-necessary” medical treatment such as preventative dental care, reconstructive plastic surgery following gross injury, and special diets for people with serious medical conditions such as diabetes, while affirmatively offering “medically necessary” sterilization to women in labor, its motive is clear.

This eugenicist plan exposes the fraud behind “gender responsiveness” in the criminal legal system—policies coming from this dangerous movement have nothing to do with improving women’s lives. Legislators in California and beyond should know better than to consider returning to a shameful eugenicist past wherein the government sterilized thousands of women of color, low-income women, women with disabilities, and LGBTIQ people and instead stand up for what we all know is right: communities where everyone is worth caring for.

No one who cares about women of color and low-income women, racial justice, or reproductive rights can sit by and allow the “gender responsiveness” movement to spread nationally.

What we need is a true gender justice response to the harms of imprisonment. Prison expansion—even if cloaked in rhetoric proclaiming to improve women’s lives—has everything to do with the gender and reproductive oppression of women, girls, transgender and gender non-conforming people from communities of color and low-income communities.

We must radically reduce the number of people in prison, beginning with a moratorium on new prison construction and staffing. We can then redirect funds saved from prison expansion into the local services that women, girls, and transgender and gender non-conforming people need, including housing, healthcare, education, employment, and community-based responses to interpersonal violence—independent of the criminal legal system. Only then can we have true gender justice.

We call on legislators, community members, activists and academics to join us in stopping prison expansion and the reinstitutionalization of state-sponsored eugenicist practices in the United States. California’s “gender responsive” prison expansion plans in Assembly Bill 76 must be stopped; its Gender Responsive Strategies Commission must be dismantled; and any state employee who fails to oppose policy or practice involving the sterilization of women in prison must be fired. All state and federal legislators must know that “gender responsive” prison expansion and eugenicist strategies are unacceptable anywhere. Accountability to women’s healthcare, reproductive freedom, and racial justice demands nothing less.

Sincerely,

Organizations
  • A New Way of Life Reentry Project
  • Asian Communities for Reproductive Justice
  • Asian Prisoner Support Committee
  • The Birth Attendants Prison Doula Project
  • Civil Liberties and Public Policy Program, Hampshire College
  • Committee on Women, Population, and the Environment
  • Communities Against Rape and Abuse
  • Community Reveille Productions
  • Creative Interventions
  • Critical Resistance Oakland
  • Georgians for Choice
  • Health Initiatives for Youth
  • INCITE! Women of Color Against Violence
  • Justice Now
  • Latinas Organizing for Reproductive Equality
  • National Asian Pacific American Women’s Forum
  • National Latina Institute for Reproductive Health
  • National Lawyers Guild at Golden Gate University
  • New Voices Pittsburgh: Women of Color for Reproductive Justice
  • Queer Progressive Agenda
  • Population and Development Program, Hampshire College
  • Sewanee Women’s Center
  • Sistersong Women of Color Reproductive Health Collective
  • Sylvia Rivera Law Project
  • The Catapult Corporation, Inc.
  • Transgender, Gender Variant, Intersex Justice Project
  • Young Women’s Empowerment Project
Individuals*
  • Abby Lippman, Professor, McGill University
  • Alegra Edelman
  • Alene Smith, ACLU Santa Cruz
  • Alexander Lee, Transgender, Gender Variant, and Intersex Justice Project
  • Alexandra Szcepanski, J.D. Candidate, Golden Gate University
  • Aline C. Gubrium, Assistant Professor in Public Health, University of Massachusetts, Amherst
  • Alisa Welleck, LGBT Community Center
  • Alison Alkon, Graduate Student Instructor, University of California, Davis
  • Alka Arora, Ph.D. Candidate, University of Washington Department of Women’s Studies
  • Ama R. Saran, Principal, The Catapult Corporation, Inc.
  • Amber Kutka, Young Women’s Empowerment Project
  • Amy Oliver, Population and Development Program, Hampshire College
  • Anne Olson
  • Angela Davis, Professor of History of Consciousness, University of California, Santa Cruz
  • Anita Brakman
  • Anjali Venna, ACLU Santa Cruz
  • Barbara Horn, Women’s Studies, Nassau Community College/SUNY
  • Betsy Hartmann, Director, Population and Development Program, Hampshire College
  • Beverly Gaston
  • Cara Page, National Director, Committee on Women, Population, and the Environment
  • Cara Saleska, Director, Community Reveille Productions
  • Cember Picconi
  • Chandra Waring, University of Connecticut Women’s Center
  • Charity Crouse, Young Women’s Empowerment Project
  • Chela Delgado, INCITE! Women of Color Against Violence Bay Area Chapter
  • Chloe Montgomery
  • Cindy Ibarra, Young Women’s Empowerment Project
  • Crystal Middlestadt
  • Deepali Gokhale, Founder, Queer Progressive Agenda
  • Diana Nikkel
  • Dora Rosen
  • Dyana Prince
  • Dominique McKinney, Young Women’s Empowerment Project
  • Dulce Garcia
  • Elena R. Gutierrez, Assistant Professor, University of Illinois
  • Elizabeth Kennedy
  • Esperanza Macras, Executive Director, Health Initiatives for Youth
  • Ilana Turoff
  • Iraya Robles
  • Jamia Wilson, Graduate Student, New York University
  • Jeffrey Allen Collins
  • Jennifer Nelson, University of Redlands
  • Gael Guevara, Sylvia Rivera Law Project
  • Genevieve Heth
  • Genevieve M. Brackins, Florida State University
  • Georgia Tyrrell
  • Gopal Dayaneni, Communications and Campaign Strategy Consultant
  • Heidi Hengel, Co-Chair, Law Students for Choice at Golden Gate University
  • Isa Villaflor, Young Women’s Empowerment Project
  • Kimberly Robertson
  • Isabel D. Kang, Korean Community Center of the East Bay
  • Jade Souza, Labor and Postpartum Doula
  • Jalan Washington, Graduate Student, Columbia University Mailman School of Public Health
  • Jamarah Amani
  • Jamia Wilson, Graduate Student, New York University
  • Jamie D. Brooks, Staff Attorney, The National Health Law Program
  • Jamie Roberts, Assistant Public Defender
  • Jane Mee Wong
  • Jeffery Collins, Oglethorpe University
  • Jennifer Nelson, Assistant Professor, University of Redlands
  • Joyce Brodsky, ACLU Santa Cruz
  • Julia Sudbury, Professor, Mills College Department of Ethnic Studies
  • Julia MacMillan
  • K.W. Shanley
  • Kaila Morris
  • Kate Villarreal, Community Coalition for Environmental Justice
  • Kathryn Akagi
  • Kerrie Lynn, Charis Circle
  • Kimberly Robertson
  • Lara Estrada
  • LaTasha Mayes, Founder, New Voices Pittsburgh: Women of Color for Reproductive Justice
  • Latrina Rhinehart, Teacher
  • Laura Benson
  • Laura Kent-Morning, J.D. Candidate, Golden Gate University
  • Laiwa Wu, Smith College
  • Lisa Jervis, Founding Editor and Publisher, Bitch Magazine
  • Lisa Sun-Hee Park, Associate Professor, University of California, San Diego
  • Lisabeth Castro-Smyth
  • Loretta Ross, National Coordinator, Sistersong Women of Color Reproductive Health Collective
  • Luke Newton
  • Maria Nakae, Asian Communities for Reproductive Justice
  • Mariela Alburges, Founding Member, Latinas Organizing for Reproductive Equality
  • Marlene Fried, Civil Liberties and Public Policy Program, Hampshire College
  • Martha Escobar, Ph.D. Candidate, University of California, San Diego
  • Martha Vanessa Saldivar
  • Mateus Chavez
  • Mavel Armijo
  • Megan Rogers
  • Melinda B. Manlin
  • Mia Mingus, Co-Executive Director, Georgians for Choice
  • Michael A. Manlin
  • Michael Flynn, J.D. Candidate, Golden Gate University
  • Mimi Kim, Executive Director, Creative Interventions
  • Miriam Traore
  • Monica Martin, Postdoctoral Scholar, University of California, Davis
  • Nancy Ordover, Author, American Eugenics: Race, Queer Anatomy, and the Science of Nationalism
  • Nancy Stoller, Professor of Community Studies, University of California at Santa Cruz
  • Nat Smith, Chapter Organizer, Critical Resistance Oakland
  • Natalie Sokoloff, Editor, The Criminal Justice System and Women
  • Nicole Erny
  • Nicole Lencioni
  • Nicole Perez
  • Olga Euben
  • Olga Herndon, Common Ground Athens
  • Patricia Willis, Professor of Women’s and Gender Studies
  • Rachael Snow, Sewanee Women’s Center
  • Rachel Marcus
  • Rita Valenti, Registered Nurse
  • ‘Ron Daniella Anglon, Cultural Worker
  • Rosa Wong-Chie, Chinatown Community Development
  • Ryanna Adams, Young Women’s Empowerment Project
  • Samantha E. Erskine, Legal Momentum: Advancing Women's Rights
  • Sara Siegel
  • Sarah Paynter, Simon Fraser University
  • Seaira Smith
  • Sepida Aghdaee, Health Educator, Tiburcio Vasquez Health Center
  • Serena Huang, Board Member, Agape Foundation
  • Shawna Scott
  • Shira Hassan, Young Women’s Empowerment Project
  • Simon Knaphus, J.D. Candidate
  • Stacy Boyer
  • Stephanie Gilloud, Program Director, Project South
  • Tema Okun
  • Tenayne Hable-Michael
  • Travis Upright
  • Veronica I. Arreola, Board Member, Chicago Abortion Fund
  • Yaya Raiz
  • Yvette Cooper
  • Zoe Hammer, Northern Arizona University Department of Criminal Justice

*organizational affiliation listed for identification purposes only

CC:

  • Erika Contreras, Office of Jose Solorio, Chair, Assembly Public Safety Committee (916) 319-2169
  • Gail Delihant, Office of Greg Aghazarian, Vice Chair, Assembly Public Safety Committee (916) 319-2126
  • David Yow, Office of Joel Anderson, Assembly Public Safety Committee (916) 319-2177
  • Glenda Corcoran, Office of Hector De La Torre, Assembly Public Safety Committee, (916) 319-2150
  • Carlos Machado, Office of Mark Leno, Assembly Public Safety Committee (916) 319-2113
  • Bill Barnes, Office of Fiona Ma, Assembly Public Safety Committee (916) 319-2112
  • Philip Horner, Office of Anthony J. Portantino, Assembly Public Safety Committee, (916) 319-2144

CWPE at the U.S. Social Forum

CWPE is going to the U.S. Social Forum.

Are you? Join thousands of activists who will come to share space to learn, inspire, envision and act on what it takes to realize another world.

CWPE Staff and Steering Committee Bios

Content

Staff

Cara Page, National Director

She is a queer rights, reproductive rights, human rights and women’s health activist and artist based in the U.S. Southeast. She strives to bring visibility to the issues impacting women of color’s bodies and to build the sustainability and well being of poor people and people of color communities through health advocacy, political education and creating healing and response networks. Through her work at CWPE she continues to highlight the intersections between eugenic practices and population control, privatization of women’s bodies and healthcare, and the misuse of dangerous chemicals and contraceptives on impoverished communities.

Cara Saleska, Communications and Outreach Coordinator

Cara is a videographer and media activist. She believes in the power of art and media for saving lives and challenges mainstream media’s distorted images of people, while working to put positive and truthful imagery into the world. Cara’s passion and work are grounded in ending violence against women and children, fighting for reproductive freedom, and promoting economic justice for all people. She is particularly interested in understanding the intersectionality of oppression and using creative organizing, art, and technology to create a beautiful, peaceful, and just world.

National Steering Committee

Rajani Bhatia, Former coordinator

She is currently a PhD student in the Department of Women’s Studies at the University of Maryland, College Park.

Binta Jeffers, Editor and Interactive Designer

Binta Jeffers collaborates with CWPE to translate archived materials concerning population control into an interactive portfolio of image and text. As a designer and researcher, Binta's work centers on the production of visual culture and the construction of race, gender, and identity through modern and contemporary media.

Marsha J. Tyson Darling

Marsha J. Tyson Darling (58 years old), is a woman of color who is also an engaged social- scientist who both teaches at the college level and donates much of her time and research findings to women’s social justice and human rights organizations. She teaches about social justice movements, women and international development, and significant issues in globalization. She does research on the impact of globalization on distributive justice issues, including the emergence of biomedical technologies and their impact on bodily integrity, reproductive justice, privacy and human rights. She has been a member of the Committee on Women, Population, & the Environment for many years, and formed and chairs the organization’s working group on Gender, Eugenics and Biotechnology. She has also served on the boards of the Association for Women’s Rights in Development, the National Black Women’s Health Project, Project Erase Racism, and the Long Island Women’s Agenda. CWPE, along with OurBodies, Ourselves and the Center for Genetics and Society were the co-conveners of Gender and Justice in the Gene Age.

Judy Norsigian

Judy Norsigian (56 years old), co-author of Our Bodies, Ourselves and Executive Director of Our Bodies Ourselves, speaks and writes frequently on a wide range of women’s health concerns. She has more than 35 years of experience in the women’s health movement and has appeared on numerous national television and radio programs. Her interests include reproductive health concerns, the media and women’s health, genetics, tobacco and women, women and health care reform, and midwifery advocacy.

Loretta J. Ross

Loretta J. Ross is the National Coordinator of the SisterSong Women of Color Reproductive Health Collective, a network founded in 1997 of 76 women of color and allied organizations that work on reproductive justice issues. In 2004, Ms. Ross was National Co-Director of the April 25, 2004 March for Women’s Lives in Washington D.C., the largest protest march in U.S. history with more than one million participants. From 1996-2004, she was the Founder and Executive Director of the National Center for Human Rights Education (NCHRE) in Atlanta, Georgia.

Judith A. M. Scully

Judith A. M. Scully is a graduate of the University of Chicago (B.A. 1983) and the George Washington University National Law Center (J.D. 1986). Since 1996, Ms. Scully has been teaching at the West Virginia University College of Law. She teaches Criminal Law; Criminal Trial Practice; Trial Advocacy; Legal Drafting; Race, Racism, and American Law; Criminal Procedure; and an international human rights course that focuses on the transition to democracy in South Africa. Prior to teaching law, Ms. Scully represented defendants in criminal cases and plaintiffs in police brutality and discrimination cases. She has served as an arbitrator for the Circuit Court of Cook County and an administrative law judge for the Cook County Commission on Human Rights. From 1987-1989, she was the Deputy Director of the City of Chicago Board of Ethics for the late Mayor Harold Washington.

In addition to being a lawyer, Ms. Scully is also a trained gynecological health care worker. She is a member of the Committee on Women, Population and the Environment and has been a reproductive rights activist for the past sixteen years.

Side Content

Volunteer Organizers for Critical Action (VOCA)

Content

OPEN CALL FOR YOUNG ARTISTS AND ACTIVISTS TO BECOME VOLUNTEER ORGANIZERS & INTERNS TO WORK AGAINST POPULATION CONTROL!

The VOCA Program (Volunteer Organizers for Critical Action) builds leadership in the reproductive justice/rights, environmental rights, and human rights movements by promoting research and action that offers a critical feminist perspective of how to move the blame and control off of women’s bodies and marginalized communities (eg. communities of color, l/b/g/t/q/i and poor communities).

Through a meaningful volunteer and internship experience, we seek to create an opportunity for you to work with us to grow and develop your intellectual and creative skills in building a movement. The VOCA Program will develop your skills through:
  • Trainings on issues pertaining to the criminalization, militarization, and controlling of women’s bodies and their communities

  • Coalition building regionally, nationally, and internationally across sectors

  • Building skills on implementing programs and actions for movement building

  • Researching and writing on issues pertaining to human rights, ethics, and regulations of access to quality reproductive healthcare

  • Learning how to evaluate and measure the impact of community based research projects
  • Using mixed media and technology for web based projects and actions

Fill out this application and return your application and your resume to Cara Saleska at csaleska(at)cwpe.org.

Call or email us for more information about how to apply.

404.588.1006 or info@cwpe.org

Scarcity & Population Control - Workshop

Content

Scarcity & Population Control - Workshop

Population Control 101 - Workshop

Content

Population Control 101 - Workshop

Sterilization Abuse & Other Forms of Eugenics as Population Control Practices - Intro Workshop

Content

Sterilization Abuse & Other Forms of Eugenics as Population Control Practices - Introductory Workshop

VOCA Application

Content

Application for Volunteer Organizers for Critical Action (VOCA)

Eugenics Timeline

Content

Eugenics Timeline (Excel File)

C.R.A.C.K. Call To Action

Topics:

Source:

New York Times Magazine, April 15, 2005

Quinacrine Call To Action

Topics:

Anti-C.R.A.C.K. Stickers From CARA

Content

Anti-C.R.A.C.K. Stickers From CARA

About CWPE

Content

Committee on Women, Population, & the Environment (CWPE) is a multi-racial alliance of feminist community organizers, scholarly activists, and health practitioners committed to promoting the social and economic empowerment of women in a context of global peace and justice; and to eliminating poverty.

We envision the social and economic empowerment of women in a context of global peace and justice and look to a world where human rights are valued above profit-driven consumerism. This world we envision is free of poverty, white supremacy, militarism, religious chauvinism, patriarchy and other oppressive systems that threaten our health, environment and global well-being.

WHAT WE DO:
  • Support women’s right to safe, voluntary birth control and abortion, while strongly opposing demographically driven population policies.
  • Challenge the belief that population growth is the primary cause of environmental degradation, conflict, and growing poverty.
  • Work to provide a broader analysis that reflects the complexity of these issues and locates the true causes in a global economic system based on exploitation, profit, and consumerism, the structures of patriarchy and racism that underlie it, and the militarism that enforces and perpetuates it.
By focusing on emerging political issues and alliances, we work to expose the human rights violations that follow from population-based analyses—such as welfare "reform" and immigration control in the North, and increasing population control in the South—and to get political attention and grassroots action on these subjects.

HOW WE DO IT:
CWPE builds partnerships with community organizers, scholar-activists, and health practitioners to accomplish our political goals.

CWPE coordinates three task forces— the vehicles through which CWPE builds strong coalitions to challenge oppressive population control policies.

CWPE Task Forces
Dangerous Contraceptive Task Force
Immigration, Environment, and Gender Task Force
Gender, Eugenics, and Biotechnology Task Force

CWPE also coordinates three critical intiatives designed to undermine reproductive violence and increase reproductive self-determination.

CWPE Initiatives
STOP C.R.A.C.K.!
DEPO DIARIES
STOP SEX SELECTION!

Side Content

Links

Content

Check out the following groups doing cutting edge political work!

Based in the United States:

The National Network of Immigration and Refugee Rights is a national organization working to promote a just immigration policy in the United States and to defend and expand the rights of all immigrants and refugees.
www.nnirr.org

Critical Resistance is a national campaign to challenge the prison industrial complex.
www.criticalresistance.org

ColorLines is a magazine on race, culture and action, devoted to covering the politics and creations of communities of color.
www.colorlines.com

The Council for Responsible Genetics (CRG) is a non-profit bio-ethics organization devoted to fostering public debate about the social, ethical, and environmental implications of the new genetic technologies.
www.gene-watch.org

The American Friends Service Committee (AFSC) is a Quaker organization that includes people of various faiths who are committed to social justice, peace, and humanitarian service.
www.afsc.org

The Midwest Treaty Network is an alliance of Indian and non-Indian community groups that support the sovereign rights of Native American nations.
www.treatyland.com

Refuse and Resist! Reproductive Freedom Task Force builds defense of women's clinics and organizes the annual National Day of Appreciation for Abortion Providers.
mojo.calyx.net/~refuse/ab/index.html

Political Research Associates is an independent, not-for-profit research center which monitors and analyzes those organizations, leaders, ideas, and activities of the US political right that undermine democracy and diversity.
www.publiceye.org

The Civil Liberties and Public Policy Program (CLPP) organizes The Fight for Abortion Rights and Reproductive Freedom (an annual conference for student and community activists at Hampshire College), and coordinates the annual National Young Women's Day of Action.
clpp.hampshire.edu

The Population and Development Program at Hampshire College seeks to provide students with a multi-disciplinary framework within which to comprehend population dynamics and reproductive rights issues internationally.
popdev.hampshire.edu

The Center for Genetics and Society is a non-profit education and advocacy organization working to alert, inform and activate broad constituencies concerning the responsible use of the new human genetic technologies. The center works with a growing network of scientists, health professionals, academics, environmentalists, civil society leaders and activists, and others who are concerned about the lack of effective societal oversight of many of the new human genetic and reproductive technologies.
www.genetics-and-society.org

INCITE! Women of Color Against Violence is a national activist organization of radical feminists of color advancing a movement to end violence against women of color and their communities through direct action, critical dialogue and grassroots organizing.
www.incite-national.org

The Political Economy Research Institute (PERI) is committed to conducting and disseminating research to inform policy makers and grassroots activists who are trying to improve living standards and to create a more just, democratic, and ecologically sustainable world.
www.umass.edu/peri

ECO-Action's work is based on the intersection of three things --threats to human health, environmental degradation and social injustice. Their mission is to help communities organize to confront environmental health threats.
www.eco-act.org

Project South is a leadership development organization based in the US South creating spaces for movement building. We work with communities pushed forward by the struggle to strengthen leadership and provide popular political & economic education for personal & social transformation.
www.projectsouth.org

International:

The Women's Global Network for Reproductive Rights is an autonomous network of groups and individuals in every continent who aim to achieve and support reproductive rights for women.
www.wgnrr.nl

The Corner House is a United Kingdom NGO which aims to support the growth of a democratic, equitable, and non-discriminatory civil society in which communities have control over the resources and decisions that affect their lives and means of livelihood.
www.icaap.org/Cornerhouse/

Green Left Weekly is an independent, progressive publication from Australia.
www.greenleft.org.au

Feminist International Network of Resistance to Reproductive and Genetic Engineering (FINRRAGE Australia)
fcintra.deakin.edu.au/~guymer/finrrage/

Side Content

Community Education Tools

Content

Below is a list of accessible materials you can use to help mobilize people most targeted by population control policies. You can download them below as pdf files. Unless otherwise noted, you can also order hard copies of these materials by contacting CWPE.

Workshop Curricula
Other Community Education Tools

Side Content

Publications

Content

Political Environments: A Publication of Committee on Women, Population, & The Environment
Request hard copies of both current and back issues of Political Environments at info@cwpe.org, or download issues below.

Political Environments No.9 (462 KB)
Spring 2002, This issue of Political Environments celebrates the 10th anniversary of CWPE. It does so by continuing the critical analysis that has come to be expected from participating authors. This issue extends the ongoing critique of reproductive/health rights and those whose agenda contravenes the individual rights of women, men and children. It furthers the discussion regarding the legal barriers that interfere with individual freedoms and human justice. This issue of Political Environments questions the impact of the terrorist attacks of September 11th, 2001 and how reaction to the attacks has been translated into discriminatory practices and prejudicial violence against immigrants through coercive immigration policies. This issue also celebrates the successes of CWPE members through their activism and commitment. It applauds their efforts and encourages everyone to believe that individuals can - and MUST - make a difference.

Political Environments No.8 (470 KB)
Winter/Spring 2001, This issue of Political Environments brings you up to date on a variety of threats to women's health and rights and efforts to resist them. These include the fights against Quinacrine sterilization, CRACK, unethical use of Depo Provera, the greening of hate, the new eugenics, and population control policies in India. We also include several articles exploring the internal politics of the women's movement around race and racism, growing corporatization, and the conflict over collaboration with law enforcement agencies.

Political Environments No.7 (3.8 MB)
Fall 1999/Winter 2000, This issue of Political Environments investigates C.R.A.C.K., the Sierra Club’s move right and away from democracy, CWPE’s opposition to the “Day of 6 Billion,” Feminism & Environmental Justice, Privatization & Bioagriculture, and a special prison section.

Political Environments No.6 (1.6 MB)
Fall 1998, This issue of Political Environments looks at an organizing win that defeats the Greening of Hate at the Sierra Club, quinacrine sterilizations banned in India, an analysis of a border shooting, refugee women and population control, and framing the ethics of abortion rights.

***

Whose Safety? Women of Color and the Violence of Law Enforcement
Published by the American Friends Service Committee and the Committee on Women, Population, and the Environment, Philadelphia, May 2001. Copyright © 2001 Anannya Bhattacharjee.

This comprehensive research report documents how women of color, both immigrant and U.S-born, face violence and the abuse of authority from law-enforcement agencies - from local police to the prison system to INS raids. Drawing on interviews with nearly 100 anti-violence activists as well as published sources, "Whose Safety?" outlines community interactions with enforcement agencies, the impact of enforcement violence on key areas of women's lives, and current anti-violence movements.

Whose Safety? (Executive Summary, 41 Kb)
Whose Safety? (Full Version, 257 Kb)

Hard copy ordering information : Printed copies of "Whose Safety?" are available for $5 per copy with a discount of 10 percent on five or more copies. Add $3.50 postage & handling. Only prepaid orders may be accepted; foreign orders will be billed for actual postage. Send orders to Literature Resources Unit, AFSC, 1501 Cherry St., Philadelphia, PA 19102. Credit card orders may be phoned in to 1-888-588-2372.

***

Policing the National Body: Race, Gender and Criminalization
Edited by Jael Silliman and Anannya Bhattacharjee, South End Press, 378 pages.

One of the key concerns among women of color and poor communities today is the difficulty of sustaining families in the face of increasing criminalization. Aggressive law enforcement, welfare reform, and draconian immigration and population policies have made one of the most fundamental reproductive rights-the right to have a child and raise a family-a battleground for women of color and poor women. Policing the National Body places issues of race, class, and gender at the center of the reproductive rights and social justice agenda. This timely collection reveals the unrelenting efforts by conservatives-including misguided environmentalists and religious fundamentalists-to define and regulate reproduction in ways that uphold white privilege. In the wake of September 11, as aggressive law enforcement has escalated, this important collection provides ammunition to combat the erosion of civil liberties.

For more information on the book, including a list of chapters, go here: http://cwpe.org/resources/publications/policing
Small orders (less than 15) can be ordered directly from CWPE. Just e-mail us at info@cwpe.org or call us at (404) 588-1006 for more info.
To order more than 15 copies, contact South End Press at 1-800-533-8478 or fax 617- 547-1333 or order through their website: http://southendpress.org/2004/items/PolicingBody.

Review and exam copy requests should be faxed or mailed on letterhead. Please include information about the course or journal. Write South End Press, 7 Brookline St. #1, Cambridge MA 02139-4146 or e-mail them at southend@igc.org.

***

Dangerous Intersections: Feminist Perspectives on Population, Environment, and Development
Edited by Jael Silliman and Ynestra King, South End Press, 324 pages.

Dangerous Intersections provides crucial alternative voices and approaches to the short-sighted policies supported by many mainstream politicians and nongovernmental organizations policies that focus on the fertility of poor women of color, North and South, as the primary threat to the ecological viability of the planet. The authors make a reasoned yet impassioned argument for making women the central agents of their own fate and the fate of the planet.

For more information on the book, including a list of chapters, go here: http://cwpe.org/publications/dangerous.htm
Small orders (less than 15) can be ordered directly from CWPE. Just e-mail us at info@cwpe.org or call us at (404) 588-1006 for more info.
To order more than 15 copies, contact South End Press at 1-800-533-8478 or fax 617- 547-1333 or order through their website: http://southendpress.org/2004/items/Dangerous.

Review and exam copy requests should be faxed or mailed on letterhead. Please include information about the course or journal. Write South End Press, 7 Brookline St. #1, Cambridge MA 02139-4146 or e-mail them at southend@igc.org.

Side Content

Militarization, Criminalization, & Surveillance

Content

Militarized Zones:
Militarized Zones was published in November 2003 by American Friends Service Commitee, CWPE, and the Population and Development program, Hampshire College, as a special issue of Political Environments (PE No. 10). It includes a series of brief, accessible activist resources plus an annotated guide to groups working on issues of gender and militarism, in the US and internationally. Edited by Ryn Gluckman, Rachael Kamel, & Betsy Hartmann.

2003 saw the growth of an unprecedented global movement against war and militarism — a movement that is challenging the culture of militarism at its roots as well as its branches. Yet war and militarism are not just “out there,” they are “in here,” in our communities, our economy, our schools, our media, and even in our minds.

Militarized Zones lifts up women's voices to explore how war-making is linked to racism, the criminalization of immigrants, attacks on LGBT communities, the demonization of Arabs and Muslims, the portrayal of young people as a threat to the future, the role of “demographic politics” in the Israeli-Palestinian conflict, restrictions on reproductive freedom, and more.

You can download a pdf copy of Militarized Zones here:
http://www.cwpe.org/resources/mcs/militarized-zones.pdf

You can also order it from the American Friends Service Committee for $5 plus $1 postage & handling. Order from Community Relations Unit, AFSC, 1501 Cherry St., Philadelphia , PA 19102 . (Sorry, only prepaid orders can be accepted.) Bulk rates available. For more information please contact cruweb@afsc.org or 215.241.7126.

Whose Safety? Women of Color and the Violence of Law Enforcement
Published by the American Friends Service Committee and the Committee on Women, Population, and the Environment, Philadelphia, May 2001. Copyright © 2001 Anannya Bhattacharjee.

This comprehensive research report documents how women of color, both immigrant and U.S-born, face violence and the abuse of authority from law-enforcement agencies - from local police to the prison system to INS raids. Drawing on interviews with nearly 100 anti-violence activists as well as published sources, "Whose Safety?" outlines community interactions with enforcement agencies, the impact of enforcement violence on key areas of women's lives, and current anti-violence movements.
Hard copy ordering information : Printed copies of "Whose Safety?" are available for $5 per copy with a discount of 10 percent on five or more copies. Add $3.50 postage & handling. Only prepaid orders may be accepted; foreign orders will be billed for actual postage. Send orders to Literature Resources Unit, AFSC, 1501 Cherry St., Philadelphia, PA 19102. Credit card orders may be phoned in to 1-888-588-2372.

More Articles:

Side Content

Immigration

Content

Articles on Immigration
Greening of Hate
Whose Safety? Women of Color and the Violence of Law Enforcement
Published by the American Friends Service Committee and the Committee on Women, Population, and the Environment, Philadelphia, May 2001. Copyright © 2001 Anannya Bhattacharjee.

This comprehensive research report documents how women of color, both immigrant and U.S-born, face violence and the abuse of authority from law-enforcement agencies - from local police to the prison system to INS raids. Drawing on interviews with nearly 100 anti-violence activists as well as published sources, "Whose Safety?" outlines community interactions with enforcement agencies, the impact of enforcement violence on key areas of women's lives, and current anti-violence movements.
Hard copy ordering information: Printed copies of "Whose Safety?" are available for $5 per copy with a discount of 10 percent on five or more copies. Add $3.50 postage & handling. Only prepaid orders may be accepted; foreign orders will be billed for actual postage. Send orders to Literature Resources Unit, AFSC, 1501 Cherry St., Philadelphia, PA 19102. Credit card orders may be phoned in to 1-888-588-2372.

More Resources on Immigrant Justice

Side Content

Environment

Content

CWPE investigates the reasons why a variety of environmental problems are defined or presented as population problems. It rejects the notion that population size and growth are primarily responsible for environmental degradation. This notion is created and spread by an alliance between the mainstream media, environmental organizations, and population control advocates, especially in the United States. In many countries even where population growth rates have fallen, environmental conditions continue to decline. The industrialized countries, which have the lowest population growth, are in fact the major consumers of the world's resources.

Environmental degradation derives from complex and interrelated causes:
  • Economic systems, with a drive for short-term and short-sighted gains and profits, exploit and misuse nature and people.

  • War-making and arms production destroy the natural environment, perpetuate the militarization of culture, hardening gender differences, and divert resources from human needs.

  • Disproportionate consumption patterns of the affluent the world over wreak havoc on the environment. Currently, the industrialized nations, with 22 percent of the world's population, consume 70 percent of the world's resources. Within the United States, deepening economic inequalities mean that the poor are consuming less, and the rich more.

  • Agribusiness, timber, mining, and energy corporations displace small farmers and indigenous peoples, often with encouragement and assistance from international financial institutions, and the complicity of national governments.

  • Migration from rural areas combined with inadequate planning and resource allocation in towns and cities result in rapid urbanization and intensify conditions of poverty.

  • New technologies often exploit rather than restore natural resources.

Many issues and debates about population and the environment focus on population control as a key to preventing environmental decline without any real analysis of women's poverty and their lack of access to resources. Public policy institutions and international agencies use the rhetoric of women's empowerment, but it is not linked to a concrete policy agenda to improve women's lives or the quality of the environment. CWPE brainstorms with other like-minded national and international organizations, raising concerns about the ways such issues are addressed, and makes effort to build allies in the environmental community to promote environmental justice and women's rights.

Quick Links:
CWPE Analysis on the Environment
Call for a New Approach
One of CWPE's first actions was to develop a statement on global environmental degradation, calling for an approach, which does not single out population size and growth as its primary cause. The Call for a New Approach was presented at the UN Summit on Environment and Development (Rio de Janeiro, 1992), the UN Conference on Human Rights (Vienna, 1993), the 7th International Women and Health Meeting (Kampala,1993), the International Women's Health Conference for Cairo (Rio de Janeiro, 1994), and the International Conference on Population and Development (Cairo, 1994). Signed by over 300 groups from many countries, the Call for a New Approach is also available in French and Spanish. Request these by writing us at info@cwpe.org.

Women, Population & the Environment : Call For A New Approach

Environmentalism & Population Control
Greening of Hate
More Resources On Environmental Justice

Side Content

Population Control

Content

"Overpopulation" is often proclaimed as the root of all global problems. Journalists and public policy experts claim that crises ranging from civil war in Rwanda to deforestation in the Amazon are the result of overpopulation. CWPE challenges the dominant representations of population, which are largely simplistic and ahistorical, ignoring the political and economic causes of poverty, environmental degradation, and conflict such as the legacy of colonialism, militarism and corporate greed.

CWPE exposes the people, philosophies, funding and politics behind such analyses. Most demographically-driven population control policies and programs are deeply disrespectful of women, particularly women of color and their children. Such policies disempower women; they treat women as objects of control, and violate the basic feminist tenets of reproductive choice and bodily integrity. We direct attention to the roots of poverty, patriarchy, and environmental destruction, and work with progressive movements to find socially just solutions.

CWPE Analysis on Population Control
Proposing Alternatives to Secondary School Curricula on Population
Currently much of the material in mainstream US textbooks presents a simplistic view of 'overpopulation' as the cause of poverty and environmental degradation, reinforcing cultural and racial stereotypes of poor people in the Third World. It also accepts the use of coercion in population control programs in countries such as India and China, ignoring important ethical issues of reproductive choice. In order to encourage the introduction of more complex, gendered, and culturally sensitive analyses of population and the environment into secondary school social studies curricula in the United States, CWPE has undertaken this project in collaboration with the Population and Development Program at Hampshire College to survey currently available mainstream and alternative curricular materials, and to assess the need for further curriculum development.
Contact Hampshire College's Civil Liberty & Public Policy Program for the following articles:
  • Demography or Teaching Fear: The Population Problem in U.S. and U.K. Social Studies Textbooks, by Anne Hendrixson

  • The Industrious Europeans and the Hungry Third World Masses: The Story of Population Told by U.S. High School Social Studies Textbooks, by Anne Hendrixson (based on research by Laura Agustín)

  • Are People a Good Thing? How British Social Studies Textbooks Present Population Issues, by Susan Bullock Leather

  • The Problem of Population in U.S. High School Biology Textbooks, by Syd Lindsley

Opposition to “Day of Six Billion”
Opposition to the Formation of a National Optimum Population Commission
Debunking Demographic Alarmism
CWPE educates population and environmental organizations on the problems of using demographic alarmism and rationales in explaining the causes of global problems. CWPE is working to produce a visual report for activist use, with analysis of demographically driven metaphors and messages produced in recent campaigns such as "Day of Six Billion," or "PLANet." It will explain why such metaphors dangerously exploit existing racism and xenophobia, and could lead to coercive population control measures.

More Resources On Population Control

Side Content

Implanon

Content

stop sterilization abuse

What is Implanon?
Implanon is a provider-controlled long-acting hormonal contraceptive implant that prevents pregnancy for a period of three years. Implanon is inserted under the skin of a woman’s upper arm. It prevents pregnancy by gradually dispensing etonogestrel, a progestogen hormone that inhibits ovulation and thickens the cervical mucus, thereby decreasing the mobility of sperm.

Implanon & Population Control
The women’s health movement has raised serious criticism regarding hormonal implants because they are long-acting and the woman has no control over them. Use of implants can be highly problematic in an environment where women are targets of population control programs. Furthermore, administration of implants is questionable when access to healthcare is limited and the public health care system is weak, because women may not get medical check-ups or may not be able to have the implant removed on demand, in case they experience negative side effects or desire a pregnancy.

Norplant, the first contraceptive implant, was introduced in 1983. Women’s health advocates have opposed Norplant because it has been used coercively on poor women and women of color both in so-called Third World countries and in the U.S. Norplant lends itself to abuse in eugenic and population control programs. Some specific examples of abuse include: women being denied removal on demand or discouraged from early removal, the insertion of Norplant free of charge but charging the full cost for early removal, and the stipulation that women on social welfare accept Norplant.

Health Concerns
Along with these ethical concerns, serious health problems have been associated with use of Norplant including blindness, depression and ectopic pregnancy. It was discovered that during clinical trials with Norplant, little emphasis was placed on recording the actual incidences of side-effects, and follow-up was inadequate. As women’s health advocates, we want to avoid this abuse of contraceptives and ensure that all side-effects experienced by women are taken seriously and studied thoroughly before the drug reaches the market. Since Implanon is a contraceptive analogous to Norplant®; we fear that similar problems may surface.

Implanon has the side-effects of progestogen-only contraceptives, such as the following:
  • Virtually all women will experience a change in bleeding pattern; this could include prolonged bleeding, frequent bleeding, infrequent bleeding or amenorrhea. Some women may even experience a range of these bleeding patterns while using Implanon.

  • Weight gain (20% of women experienced a weight increase of 10% or more)

  • Headaches, nausea, breast pain and mood swings

  • Acne (14% of women); 10% of pre-existing acne worsened

  • Beneficial side-effects: some women experienced an improvement in pre-existing acne (59%) or dysmenorrhea (88%) after the insertion of Implanon.

Assessment
Although there are some advantages of Implanon over Norplant, such as easier insertion and removal and a shorter duration of effects, they are similar in many respects. This leaves us with many questions: Will Implanon also become a tool for population control?; Will serious health concerns arise when Implanon is widely used in diverse populations?; Will Implanon be useful for women?; and How will it affect women whose health and nutritional status is compromised?

After reviewing the clinical data available on Implanon, we are not satisfied with the low number of trial participants and the way certain aspects were monitored. For example, return of fertility was measured by the return of ovulation within a period of three months following the removal of Implanon. We think this does not sufficiently confirm a woman’s ability to become pregnant or give birth to a healthy baby.

For more information, please e-mail: office@wgnrr.nl or write to WOMEN’S GLOBAL NETWORK FOR REPRODUCTIVE RIGHTS (WGNRR), VROLIKSTRAAT 453-D, 1092 TJ AMSTERDAM, THE NETHERLANDS

The Facts on Norplant

Content

stop sterilization abuse

What is Norplant? Norplant is a provider-controlled, hormonal contraceptive for women that prevents pregnancy for five years after a single application. A physician inserts six Norplant capsules into a woman’s upper arm. These capsules release the hormone progestin slowly, over time, preventing pregnancy through a combination of inhibiting ovulation and thickening cervical mucus. Norplant must be removed by a trained physician.

Sacrificing Women’s Health to Pregnancy Prevention Promoting Norplant and Depo-Provera to women because the contraceptives prevent pregnancy in the long-term and do not require daily user-controlled dosage or partner cooperation, prioritizes these factors over women’s overall health, and minimizes the negative side effects associated with using these methods. By minimizing these potentially serious side effects, we are basically told that we, as women, are not entitled to sex and health, too. The message from providers and policy-makers is that if you have sex, you must pay the price in unwanted pregnancy or debilitating side effects.

Norplant users can experience: Severe headaches, depression, nervousness, change in appetite, extreme weight gain, hair loss, nausea, dizziness, acne, breast tenderness, swelling of the ovaries and ovarian cysts, difficulties with insertion and removal (including infection), and even nerve damage. There is a connection between Norplant use and stroke and heart attack. Norplant interrupts a women’s menstrual cycle. About 82% of Norplant users experience irregular, usually heavy, bleeding for the first year that can last for months on end. Others do not have their periods or experience irregular spotting.

Provider-controlled, not women controlled Providers often steer young black women towards Norplant and Depo-Provera without making available other methods like condoms, which are controlled by the user. Without education about all methods available, a woman cannot make an informed "choice" about which contraceptive form best fits with her lifestyle and state of health.

The new "choices" of Norplant and Depo-Provera are administered by doctors rather than by women themselves. In the case of Norplant, doctors must insert and remove the device, and many poor and low-income women have trouble finding the financial means and qualified doctors to remove the device. Women on Medicaid who want the device removed because of debilitating side effects may not receive coverage for removal. And, although many doctors know how to insert Norplant, far fewer know how to remove the device or are willing to do so for patients on Medicaid. In Oklahoma, South Carolina and South Dakota, Medicaid policies support Norplant insertion but restrict removal.

Stop Quinacrine!

Content

stop sterilization abuse

What is Quinacrine?
Quinacrine hydrochloride is a drug that was developed in the late 1920s to prevent and treat malaria. In recent years it has achieved notoriety as a female sterilization agent. As a worldwide sterilization crusade, launched by American MD Elton Kessel and public health doctor Stephen Mumford, approximately 104,410 women in nineteen countries have already been subjected to quinacrine sterilizations, many of them have not consented and were not even informed that they were being sterilized.

Quinacrine causes permanent sterilization by creating scar tissue in the fallopian tubes. It comes in the form of a pellet and can be injected during a pelvic exam without a woman’s knowledge. Although the long-term side effects are not yet known, quinacrine sterilizations are associated with a number of serious short-term side effects, including burning and irritation of the vaginal walls, uterine adhesions, ectopic pregnancies, and toxic psychosis. The risks associated with fetal exposure to quinacrine are also unknown.

Women’s Bodies As Testing Sites
The process, history, and political motives of the quinacrine sterilization campaign suggest that it is an example of human experimentation where poor women, particularly women of color, have been used as guinea pigs in the name of advancing reproductive technology. Despite the fact that concerns of quinacrine’s side effects have motivated family planning organizations and governments to oppose its use, Mumford and Kessel have manufactured quinacrine, arranged for its distribution, and mobilized a network of doctors, nurses, and midwives to administer it. Together these two U.S. doctors have distributed quinacrine in nineteen countries including Bangladesh, Chile, China, Colombia, Costa Rica, Croatia, Egypt, India, Indonesia, Iran, Morocco, Pakistan, the Philippines, Venezuela, Vietnam, the United States, Malaysia, and Romania.

In addition to putting women’s bodies at risk, the quinacrine campaign poses a clear threat to the autonomy of women in developing countries. Many of the women who were sterilized did not know what was happening to them. For example, in 1989, after Vietnam’s family planning program performed more than thirty thousand quinacrine sterilizations, it was reported that women working at the Hoa Binh Rubber Plantation were involuntarily sterilized.

Population Control in the Form of Sterilization Abuse
Embedded in Mumford and Kessel’s quinacrine campaign is the desire to limit immigration to the U.S. and population growth in the Third World, a desire which represents a political rather than a medical objective. The Wall Street Journal reported these views of Mumford:

“Describing quinacrine as ‘essential to population-growth control,’ he says he sees it as a means of reducing the potential number of immigrants s to the U.S. from developing nations. ‘This explosion in human numbers, which after 2050 will come entirely from immigrants and the offspring of immigrants, will dominate our lives. There will be chaos and anarchy,’ says Mr. Mumford, who relies in part on anti-immigrant forces in the U.S. for financial backing.”

In Mumford and Kessel’s quinacrine campaign, women are being treated as a means to achieve lower Third World population rates, not because it is in the best interest of the women to have fewer children, but because it will allegedly benefit the world and “American culture.” This type of philosophy subjugates women’s interests to a political agenda which is steeped in xenophobia, racism, and classism.

C.R.A.C.K.

Content

stop sterilization abuse

C.R.A.C.K. (which stands for Children Requiring a Caring Kommunity and is also known as Positive Prevention or Project Prevention) is a national population control organization that offers a $200 cash incentive to people who are addicted to drugs and alcohol to undergo a form of long-term (and often dangerous) birth control or permanent sterilization. Their mission is to "save our welfare system" and the world from the exorbitant cost to the taxpayer for each "drug addicted birth" by offering "effective preventive measures" to reduce the "tragedy" of numerous drug-affected pregnancies.

C.R.A.C.K.’s tactics disproportionately targets poor women, incarcerated women, and women of color. They intentionally advertise in poor neighborhoods and communities of color. They also work with the prison industry to target incarcerated women. C.R.A.C.K.’s approach is dangerous because the use of payment as an incentive to receive birth control undermines the very notion of reproductive choice, drug treatment, and is reminiscent of the Eugenics movement, which had the greatest momentum in the United States (1907-1941). Some of C.R.A.C.K.’s initial billboards read "Don’t let a Pregnancy Ruin Your Drug Habit." C.R.A.C.K.’s strategy is also coercive because it targets people during a significantly vulnerable period due to their chemical addiction, lack of resources, and economic desperation.

The C.R.A.C.K. program is opposed by prominent public health experts and family planning service providers who recognize that years of experience providing contraceptive services throughout the world have demonstrated that coercive programs rarely achieve their goals. The University of California, School of Public Health has published guidelines for the ethical and effective use of incentives in reproductive health programs and policies. It specifically warns against using incentives to further the use of particular contraceptive methods by limiting client choice and against offering cash bonuses to prevent pregnancy (1999). Additionally, studies have shown that women who felt pressure to select a specific method of contraception were more likely to have health problems with the method and less likely to be happy with their decision (Kols AJ, Sherman JE, Piotrow PT. "Ethical Foundations of Client-Centered Care in Family Planning," Journal of Women's Health, 1999, 8(3):303-312).

How do we address drug and alcohol addiction among pregnant and parenting women? Addiction is a treatable disease, but resources devoted to drug and alcohol treatment for women are inadequate. Moreover, addicted pregnant women who seek treatment are often turned away from programs because they are pregnant. Waiting lists are impossibly long, and budgets for treatment programs designed for women have been targeted for cuts. The federal Substance Abuse and Mental Health Services Administration, which funds 40 percent of treatment services, has reduced funding for programs for women by almost 40 percent since 1994. And federal funding for treatment programs for pregnant and postpartum women and their children is now less than 10 percent of what was available in 1995. (Drug Strategies, 1998. Keeping Score. Women and Drugs: Looking at the Federal Drug Control Budget. Washington, DC, p.29)

STOP C.R.A.C.K. IN ITS TRACKS!
CWPE supports communities and activists doing grassroots work to stop C.R.A.C.K. in its tracks. Go to our STOP C.R.A.C.K. page for more information about how to organize against C.R.A.C.K. in your neighborhood!